The Impact of Architectural Workspaces Supported by Artificial Intelligence on Psychological Productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13765920Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Architectural Design, Psychological Productivity, Workspaces, Cognitive PerformanceAbstract
This study comprehensively addresses the effects of artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced architectural work environments on psychological productivity. Artificial intelligence allows workspaces to be dynamically optimized according to physical and psychological needs, with positive effects on stress management, motivation, creativity and cognitive performance. AI-supported spaces not only increase the physical comfort of individuals by providing ergonomic solutions, but also make work processes more efficient with their customizable and flexible structures.
Research findings reveal that AI-optimized work environments reduce individuals' stress levels and thus have a positive impact on focus, creativity and job satisfaction. AI's ability to adjust environmental factors such as lighting, noise management and thermal comfort according to individual needs enhances cognitive performance and increases the overall productivity of individuals. The flexibility offered by AI technology enables greater flexibility and efficiency in business processes by quickly adapting work environments to the immediate needs of users.
In the future, it is envisaged that AI has the potential to personalize spaces with more advanced algorithms to respond not only to physical but also to emotional and mental needs. This development will provide more precise and adaptive solutions based on psychological factors such as the mood and cognitive state of individuals. Experimentally testing the long-term effects, examining the applicability in different sectors and developing more sensitive AI systems according to the personal characteristics of individuals are among the important recommendations for future studies. This study highlights the possibilities that AI-supported spaces offer in increasing efficiency in architectural designs and supporting the psychological well-being of individuals.
References
REFERANSLAR
• Allen, R., Freeman, S., Hill, M. (2021). AI and Employee Stress: Monitoring and Managing Stress in the Workplace with Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(3), 260-273.
• Anderson, K. (2018). Artificial intelligence in architecture: A new frontier for design. Journal of Architectural Innovation, 12(3), 45-57.
• Bai, Y., Sarkar, R. (2021). The integration of artificial intelligence in sustainable architectural practices. Building and Environment, 185, 107-116.
• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands-Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.
• Banbury, S. P., Berry, D. C. (2005). Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics, 48(1), 25-37.
• Boyce, P. R. (2014). Human Factors in Lighting. Lighting Research & Technology, 46(4), 465-481.
• Boyce, P. R. (2003). Human factors in lighting. CRC Press.
• Boyce, P., Hunter, C., Howlett, O. (2003). The Benefits of Daylight Through Windows. Lighting Research Center.
• Brougham, D., Haar, J. (2018). Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239-257.
• Brown, T., Green, D. (2020). AI-driven architecture: Enhancing user experience and environmental efficiency. Architectural Science Review, 63(4), 295-310.
• Choi, J. (2020). Office ergonomic interventions: An overview and analysis of their impact on workers' productivity and well-being. Workplace Health & Safety, 68(2), 57-63.
• Choi, K., Kim, S., Park, J. (2019). Daylighting Design and Its Impact on Cognitive Performance in Work Environments. Building and Environment, 153, 47-58.
• Cooper, C. L., Robertson, I. T. (2016). Well-being: Productivity and happiness at work. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer.
• Evans, G. W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 80(4), 536-555.
• Garg, P., Sinha, S. (2021). AI and the Future of Work: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100762.
• Gagné, M., Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
• Huang, M. H., Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Service: Implications for Marketing, Technology, and Human Resources. Journal of Marketing, 82(6), 128-143.
• Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M., & Andreas, H. (2022). The Role of AI in Motivating Employees: A Study on Personalized Feedback Mechanisms. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(2), 245-263.
• Kellert, S. R., Calabrese, E. F. (2015). The Practice of Biophilic Design. Biophilic Design Journal, 3, 1-19.
• Karwowski, W. (2006). International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. CRC Press.
• Kim, H., Lee, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence at Work: How the Implementation of AI in Workplaces Impacts Employee Performance and Well-Being. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 1-15.
• Kim, J., Yoon, S., Choi, K. (2020). Adaptive Lighting Systems for Personalized Work Environments Using Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Architectural Science Review, 63(1), 78-87.
• Kwallek, N., Woodson, H., Lewis, C., Sales, C. (2007). Impact of Three Interior Color Schemes on Worker Mood and Performance Relative to Individual Environmental Sensitivity. Color Research & Application, 32(2), 130-143.
• Küller, R. (2006). The impact of light and colour on psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 271-282.
• Lan, L. (2011). Effects of thermal discomfort in an office environment. Building and Environment, 46(3), 238-244.
• Le Fevre, M., Matheny, J., Kolt, G. S. (2003). Eustress, distress, and their interpretation in primary and secondary occupational stress management interventions: Which way first? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(7), 567-578.
• Lazarus, R. S., Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer.
• Lopez, M., Garcia, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and its impact on workplace design and psychological well-being. Journal of Work Psychology, 18(1), 66-82.
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (1999). Productivity in buildings: The 'killer' variables. Building Research & Information, 27(1), 4-19.
• Maher, M. L., Gero, J. S., Liew, P. (2022). Noise and Its Effect on Cognitive Load in Open Plan Offices: AI-Powered Noise Management Systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 37(1), 56-71.
• Melikoğlu, Y. (2024). A Review on Artificial Intelligence Supported User-Centered Design and Psychological Interaction. Anatolian Journal of Mental Health, 1(1):45-55.
• Nicol, J. F., Humphreys, M. A. (2002). Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 563-572.
• Quick, J. C., Henderson, D. F. (2016). Occupational stress: Preventing suffering, enhancing well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), 459.
• Shen, Y. (2019). The Role of AI in Enhancing Workplace Efficiency: Ethical and Psychological Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(4), 705-722.
• Schmidt, G. B., other authors. (2017). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Cognitive Load in Decision-Making Processes. AI & Society, 32(3), 329-340.
• Schmidt, G. B., other authors. (2019). The Role of AI in Workplace Environment: From Personalized Temperature Control to Cognitive Load Reduction. AI & Society, 34(3), 329-340.
• Smith, J., Jones, L. (2017). The impact of noise on cognitive performance in office environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 57, 70-78.
• Smith, R., Jones, P. (2023). Integrating AI in the Workplace: The Psychological Effects of Automation on Employees. Human-Computer Interaction, 38(1), 45-61.
• Smith, J., Jones, L. (2019). Energy-efficient building designs through AI: A comprehensive review. Energy and Buildings, 182, 67-79.
• Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 97-108.
• Veitch, J. A., McColl, S. L. (2001). A critical examination of perceptual and cognitive effects attributed to full-spectrum fluorescent lighting. Ergonomics, 44(3), 255-279.
• Wilson, P. (2020). Psychological Impacts of Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace: A Systematic Review. Occupational Health Psychology, 15(3), 230-247.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yahya Melikoğlu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.