Reviewer Guideline

Articles sent to Anatolian Journal of Mental Health are evaluated by at least two reviewer who are experts in their field, in accordance with the double-blind refereeing principles.

Reviewer make suggestions to the editorial board on the quality of the articles, and whether they need minor-major revisions or should be accepted or denied.

If reviewer detect any conflict of interests, ethical violations or plagiarism regarding the articles, they should report to the editorial board.

Once the reviewer accept the invitations, they have the responsibility to finish evaluations on time. Authors are also obliged to response to the notifications (Revision etc.) made by the journal on time.

Reviewer should evaluate and protect all the data sent to them, within the principles of privacy.